Cravens, Dargan & Co. v. Peyton L. Travers Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that turnover statute could not be used to reach funds deposited with a state agency when right to funds would be contested
• holding that the turnover statute could not be used to reach funds deposited with state agency when the rights to the funds would be contested because the turnover statute could not be used “to determine the ownership of the deposited funds”
• holding that the turnover statute could not be used to reach funds deposited with state agency when the rights to the funds would be contested because the turnover statute could not be used \to determine the ownership of the deposited funds\
• holding that the turnover statute could not be used to reach funds deposited with state agency when the rights to the funds would be contested because the turnover statute could not be used \to determine the ownership of the deposited funds\
• holding that the turnover statute could not be used to reach funds deposited with state agency when the rights to the funds would be contested because the turnover statute could not be used \to determine the ownership of the deposited funds\
• holding that the turnover statute could not be used to reach funds deposited with state agency when the rights to the funds would be contested because the turnover statute could not be used \to determine the ownership of the deposited funds\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).