Craven v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• plea in abatement was not successful where defendant accused of breaking and entering railroad company car and grand juror was agent of company
• plea in abatement was not successful where defendant accused of breaking and entering railroad company car and grand juror was agent of company
• no challenge propter affectum where the defendant “had warning to challenge the juror before the bill was found” but failed to do so
• no challenge propter affectum where the defendant “had warning to challenge the juror before the bill was found” but failed to do so

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).