Skip to main content
· 1/17/1985

Craven v. Crout

Citations

  • 163 Cal. App. 3d 779
  • 209 Cal. Rptr. 649
  • 1985 Cal. App. LEXIS 1535

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Where a statute referring to one subject contains a critical word or phrase, omission of that word or phrase from a similar statute on the same subject generally shows a different legislative intent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.