Cravelyn Hooker v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the Defendant’s statement “I’d like to exercise my sixth amendment right to go pro se . . . .” was unequivocal (omission in original)
• “The likelihood that a defendant would incompetently represent himself is not a valid reason to deny his unequivocal request for self-representation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).