· 8/22/1975
Cravatt v. Thomas
Citations
- 399 F. Supp. 956
- 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16480
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding UCL claim 5 concerns “the fraudulent scheme that is at the heart of this action”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: James E. Doyle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.