Craun v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that nothing presented either in the sentencing memorandum or at the sentencing hearing connected the appellant to any alleged continuing fraud and reversing and remanding for a new sentencing hearing
• remanding for resen-tencing where trial court specifically relied on speculation that defendant continued co-defendant’s ongoing scheme of defrauding victims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Marc Chantele Williams v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-06-07· cited 6×
• Goldstein v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-01-07· cited 5×
• Akeen Kadoni Paul v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-07-22

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Nusspickel v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-09-28· cited 35×
• Doty v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-11-03· cited 20×
• Evans v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-04-18· cited 10×
• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-09-04· cited 7×