Skip to main content
· 4/16/2010

Crash Dummy Movie, LLC v. Mattel, Inc.

Citations

  • 601 F.3d 1387
  • 94 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1315
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 7774
  • 2010 WL 1508203

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \The United States Congress required that every state adopt [UIFSA] by January 1
  • “Although Mattel later allowed its trademark registrations to lapse, cancellation of a trademark registration does not necessarily translate into abandonment of common law trademark rights.”
  • “The Board may consider evidence and testimony regarding Mattel’s practices that occurred before or after the three-year statutory period to infer Mattel’s intent to resume use during the three-year period.”
  • holding statement that \de- Lehmann
  • \[U]pon the unqualified consent of the defendant
  • stating that defendants who were subject to sanctions under section 13 of chapter 98-223, \ i.e.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Rader, Bryson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.