· 11/8/2010
Cranston v. State
Citations
- 936 N.E.2d 342
- 2010 Ind. App. LEXIS 2059
- 2010 WL 4410153
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that evidence tickets produced by a chemical breath test machine are not hearsay 11 because they do not involve any material human intervention
- holding an evidence ticket produced by a chemical breath machine is not hearsay
- an evidence ticket produced by a chemical breath machine is not testimonial hearsay for purposes of the Sixth Amendment
- an evidence ticket produced by a chemical breath machine is not testimonial hearsay for purposes of the Sixth Amendment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Vaidik, Robb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.