Skip to main content
· 11/8/2010

Cranston v. State

Citations

  • 936 N.E.2d 342
  • 2010 Ind. App. LEXIS 2059
  • 2010 WL 4410153

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that evidence tickets produced by a chemical breath test machine are not hearsay 11 because they do not involve any material human intervention
  • holding an evidence ticket produced by a chemical breath machine is not hearsay
  • an evidence ticket produced by a chemical breath machine is not testimonial hearsay for purposes of the Sixth Amendment
  • an evidence ticket produced by a chemical breath machine is not testimonial hearsay for purposes of the Sixth Amendment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vaidik, Robb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.