Skip to main content
· 11/8/1996

Cranston Print Works Co. v. City of Cranston

Citations

  • 684 A.2d 689
  • 1996 R.I. LEXIS 263
  • 1996 WL 648342

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding a case to a municipal body for specific findings of fact and conclusions of law where that body \failed to produce a record that would allow a determination [by the reviewing court] concerning whether its action was arbitrary and capricious\
  • remanding a case to a municipal body for specific findings of fact and conclusions of law where that body \failed to produce a record that would allow a determination [by the reviewing court] concerning whether its action was arbitrary and capricious\
  • “the council’s ‘determination must contain findings of fact which support the ultimate decision of the body’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lederberg, Murray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.