Crangle v. Kelly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that disclosure qualified as a routine use because “plaintiffs’ records were disclosed to determine whether they were sufficiently trustworthy to be granted access to the White House, and . . . the White House required [the records] to make access determinations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).