Cranford v. Ahlin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the language “[a]ny dispute arising under or in connection with this agreement or related to any matter which is the subject of this agreement” includes claim of tortious interference with contractual relationships claim
• finding tortious interference claim fell within forum-selection clause where there was “no ambiguity in the meaning of the forum- selection clause”
• finding tortious interference claim fell within forum-selection clause where there was “no ambiguity in the meaning of the forum selection clause”
• distinguishing mandatory and permissive, or exclusive and nonexclusive, forum selection clauses
• “parties can waive their right to challenge personal jurisdiction by agreeing to submit their contract to the governance of a certain court”
• “[A] forum selection clause that is mandatory is given greater weight than a permissive one.” (alteration in original) (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).