Crane v. Dameron

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding plaintiffs’ broad allegation that at some time defendant trustees made and concealed decision failed to meet requirement that petition specify essential details of fraud
• explaining that a trial court should allow a non-party to intervene in a civil case if the non-party “has a right involved in the trial and a direct and apparent interest therein”
• factual transaction determined by examining whether previous and current lawsuits “rely upon” the same facts
• “‘Cause of action’ has a broad transaction definition in the res judicata context, including the right to recover regardless of the theory of recovery.”
• “ ‘Cause of action’ has a broad transaction definition in the res judicata context, including the right to recover regardless of the theory of recovery.”
• “Res judicata will bar a second action even though the plaintiff is prepared in the second action to present evidence or grounds or theories of the case not presented in the first action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).