Utah Supreme Court· 4/23/1984

Crane v. Crane

Citations

683 P.2d 1062
1984 Utah LEXIS 815

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that plaintiffs had prescriptive easement in gross to drive cattle across land
holding that plaintiffs had prescriptive easement in gross to drive cattle across land
concluding that the use of an easement to drive a herd of cattle to their summer range was a commercial use because the cattle were raised for profit and not for personal use
concluding that use was continuous where a cattle grazing association drove cattle over a portion of the landowner’s property twice a year—once in the fall, and once in the spring, i.e., whenever the claimant needed to do so
concluding that use was continuous where a cattle grazing association drove cattle over a portion of the landowner’s property, twice a year — .once in the fall, and once in the spring, i.e., whenever the claimant needed to do so
affirming the award of an easement to a grazing association to drive cattle over a limited area of a property twice a year

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Oaks, Howe, Hall, Stewart, Durham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.