Skip to main content
· 2/19/1976

Crane Co. v. Anaconda Co.

Citations

  • 39 N.Y.2d 14
  • 382 N.Y.S.2d 707
  • 346 N.E.2d 507
  • 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2371

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The jury could have reasonably concluded that defendant used force to simultaneously flee from the victim and to retain the stolen property, and that his actions constituted force within the meaning of the robbery statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wachtler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.