Crandon Capital Partners v. Shelk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting “longstanding precedent in Oregon that a party may recover its attorney fees incurred as part of the fee application and litigation process”
• describing that rule as reflecting “long- standing precedent in Oregon”
• describing that rule as reflecting “long- standing precedent in Oregon”
• applying Delaware law to determine when a pre-litigation demand may be excused
• “[T]here is longstanding precedent in Oregon that a party may recover its attorney fees incurred as part of the fee application and litigation process.”
• amendment pursuant to ORCP 23

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).