· 2/2/2005
Cramblit v. Diamond B Constructors
Citations
- 105 P.3d 906
- 197 Or. App. 358
- 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 102
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the trial court erred in awarding attorney fees to the defendant where the defen- dant “made no attempt to allege the facts, statute, or rule [that] provides a basis for a fee award” (internal quotation marks omitted)
- concluding that the trial court erred in awarding attorney fees to the defendant where the defen- dant “made no attempt to allege the facts, statute, or rule [that] provides a basis for a fee award” (internal quotation marks omitted)
- suggesting that a recognizable relationship between the facts asserted and the entitlement to attorney fees must exist
- reversing award of attorney fees where no facts were alleged that “clearly and explicitly indicate a party’s entitlement to fees”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schuman, Brewer, Bearden
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.