Skip to main content
· 2/2/2005

Cramblit v. Diamond B Constructors

Citations

  • 105 P.3d 906
  • 197 Or. App. 358
  • 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 102

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the trial court erred in awarding attorney fees to the defendant where the defen- dant “made no attempt to allege the facts, statute, or rule [that] provides a basis for a fee award” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • concluding that the trial court erred in awarding attorney fees to the defendant where the defen- dant “made no attempt to allege the facts, statute, or rule [that] provides a basis for a fee award” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • suggesting that a recognizable relationship between the facts asserted and the entitlement to attorney fees must exist
  • reversing award of attorney fees where no facts were alleged that “clearly and explicitly indicate a party’s entitlement to fees”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schuman, Brewer, Bearden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.