Skip to main content
· 5/25/2000

Crain v. Smith

Citations

  • 22 S.W.3d 58
  • 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 3582
  • 2000 WL 684819

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • statements in a demand letter sent to a non-party attorney were protected by the privilege
  • statements made in attorney’s pre-complaint letter to a prospective defendant were absolutely privileged

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seerden, Dorsey, Yáñez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.