Craigside, LLC v. Gdc View, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that interest was to run from the date a condominium developer was contractually obligated to return a sum of money but failed to do so
• holding that, on appeal of a judgment entered after a bench trial, while the parties are entitled to de novo review of the trial court’s legal rulings, an appellate court is bound by the trial court’s findings of fact where competent, substantial evidence supports the findings
• “[A]nticipatory repudiation[] . . . gives rise to a claim for damages by the nonbreaching party.” (citing Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 253 (1979))
• “Craigside unequivocally informed GDC that Craigside was not going to close . . . . In doing so, Craigside communicated an anticipatory repudiation which breached the agreement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).