Craig Wines Oliver v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a movant “could not . . . use a § 2255 petition to relitigate” a sentencing guidelines issue that was “fully and fairly presented on direct appeal” because there had not been “an intervening change in the law”
• holding that a movant “could not . . . use a § 2255 petition to relitigate” a sentencing guidelines issue that was “fully and fairly presented on direct appeal” because there had not been “an intervening change in the law”
• implicitly recognizing a § 2255 claim regarding a pre- Booker sentence when the court examined the merits of the defendant's sentencing claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).