Skip to main content
· 6/1/1923

Craig v. Radelman

Citations

  • 199 Ky. 501
  • 251 S.W. 631
  • 1923 Ky. LEXIS 869

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding defendant’s line of tote bags made fair use of plaintiffs copyrights in part because “[p]arody, like other forms of comment or criticism, has an obvious claim to transfor-mative value”
  • granting request to partially seal briefs and emphasizing “the privacy interests of the parties in preventing the public disclosure of private business figures and communications”
  • granting request to partially seal briefs and emphasizing “the privacy interests of the parties in preventing the public disclosure of private business figures and communications”
  • “Section 1125(c)(3), by its terms, protects “[a]ny fair use . . . of a famous mark by another person other than as a designation of source for the person’s own goods or services.” (emphasis in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moorman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.