Craig v. First American Capital Resources, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• The defendant's post-sale misrepresentations that an unauthorized sale would be \reversed\ did not satisfy the \in connection with\ requirement of § 10(b) [39] because they could not be said to have caused the plaintiff's purchase of securities.
• The defendant’s postsale misrepresentations that an unauthorized sale would be “reversed” did not satisfy the “in connection with” requirement of Securities Exchange Act of 1934 § 10(b) 39 because they could not be said to have caused the plaintiff’s purchase of securities.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).