Craig v. Eberly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Congress did not intend section 1997e(e) of the PLRA to apply retroactively
• noting that, to prove an Eighth Amendment violation, the plaintiff must prove a sufficiently serious deprivation and deliberate indifference
• stating that section 1997e(e) applies to cases commenced after its enactment
• noting factual dispute where inmate alleged he was allowed only two one-hour exercise periods during total confinement and jailors claimed he received one hour per week, weather permitting
• construing § 1997e(e) in accordance with the plain meaning of the section
• describing further the requirements for the subjective component of an Eighth Amendment claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).