Craig v. Department of Industrial Relations

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]his principle is intended to prevent parties from disclosing some attorney client communications while retaining other, potentially harmful communications under the guise of the attorney-client privilege.”
• “[T]he parties concede that [the defendant’s former attorney] does not have independent or first hand knowledge of the facts, nor has he been directly involved in the events giving rise to the alleged patent infringement.”
• “Pursuant to the Shelton test, [opposing counsel’s] deposition would be appropriate and necessary if Spar-ton could demonstrate that (1) no other means exist to obtain the information than to depose [opposing counsel]; (2) the information sought is relevant and non-privileged; and (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).