Craig v. Cacarillo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “counsel will not be faulted for failing to predict change in the law”
• recognizing that “counsel will not be faulted for failing to predict change in the law.”
• recognizing \counsel will not be faulted for failing to predict a change in the law.\
• “[I]n light of [Attorney] Lang’s opening argument[, the court wi]ll allow some leeway. Don’t go too far.”
• “[C]ounsel will not be faulted for failing to predict a change in the law.”
• “the charge, when read in its entirety, appropriately conveys that an accomplice or co-conspirator must possess the specific intent to kill in order to be found guilty of first-degree murder.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).