Skip to main content
· 10/26/2000

Craig v. Brown & Root, Inc.

Citations

  • 100 Cal. Rptr. 2d 818
  • 84 Cal. App. 4th 416
  • 2000 Daily Journal DAR 11469
  • 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8651
  • 16 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1591
  • 2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 819

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding “the employee’s continued 21 employment constitutes her acceptance of an agreement proposed by her employer”
  • finding that an “employee’s continued 12 employment constitutes her acceptance of an arbitration agreement proposed by her employer”
  • noting that a party’s acceptance of an 5 agreement may be “implied-in-fact where . . . the employee’s continued employment constitutes 6 her acceptance of an agreement proposed by her employer”
  • noting that a party’s acceptance of an 21 agreement may be “implied-in-fact where . . . the employee’s continued employment constitutes 22 her acceptance of an agreement proposed by her employer”
  • affirming order compelling 17 arbitration where the defendant put forth substantial evidence that the plaintiff received a 18 memorandum and brochure regarding dispute resolution procedures and the plaintiff remained 19 employed after receiving those materials
  • the court found an 19 employee’s continued employment constituted acceptance of the employer’s proposed 20 arbitration agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miriam A. Vogel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.