Craig v. Bossenbery

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a restrictive covenant defining “family” in a way that barred placement in the subdivision of a small group home for the continuous care of six or fewer intellectually disabled adults was unenforceable as violative of public policy
• “Contractual terms are not subject to judicial interpretation unless they are ambiguous”
• covenant not enforceable as a matter of public policy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).