Craig John Maisonville, and James M. Dombroski v. F2 America, Inc. F2 International, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering whether a motion is “dispositive of a claim or defense” under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)
• finding monetary sanctions imposed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 13 11 were “non-dispositive matters properly ordered by the magistrate and reviewed by 14 the district court for clear error”
• sanctions warranted for factually deficient motion which was based on the party’s 8 claim they were not notified of a status conference the party themselves had attempted to 9 cancel
• “[T]he Rule 11 sanctions imposed here were not dispositive of a claim or defense of a party. In fact, the parties had already settled the case prior to Dombroski’s filing his motion for reconsideration. Thus, under Rule 72(a
• “[T]he Rule 11 sanctions imposed here were not dispositive of a claim or defense of a party. In fact, the parties had already settled the case prior to Dombroski’s filing his motion for reconsideration. Thus, under Rule 72(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).