Craig E. Davids v. Stan Akers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• questioning and dismissing the idea that citizens, “by voting for losers, cease to be ‘persons’ under the Fourteenth Amendment for the purpose of transmitting their rights.”
• finding nothing in the Constitution “that can justify this attempt to inject the Federal Judiciary into the internal procedures of a House of a state legislature”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).