Skip to main content
· 3/20/2008

Craig & Bishop, Inc. v. Piles

Citations

  • 247 S.W.3d 897
  • 2008 Ky. LEXIS 61
  • 2008 WL 746496

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that one plaintiff \had to miss work and suffered difficulties at her job caused by constant telephoning and trips to the dealership\ and that the other also had to \miss work\
  • finding that a 6:1 ratio, while significant, was “not ridiculous”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Minton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.