Skip to main content
· 10/20/1870

Craft v. Yeaney

Citations

  • 66 Pa. 210
  • 1870 Pa. LEXIS 295

Syllabus

<p>1. Calls in a deed are always to be controlled by lines on the ground.</p> <p>2. Heath sold a subdivision of a warrant, marking the east line on the ground, west of the east line of the warrant; the deed called for the east line of the warrant as the boundary. Held, that the call was controlled by the marked line.</p> <p>3. Heath brought ejectment for the portion — which was unseated — east of the subdivision and recovered a verdict and judgment; a habere was not issued. Held, that he might maintain trespass on his constructive possession.</p> <p>4. Caldwell v. Walters, 10 Harris 280, distinguished.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the Uniformity Clause requires uniformity within the territorial limits of the [a]uthority levying the tax
  • school district’s tax invalid where, without reasonable justification, taxpayers residing in different counties were charged different amounts for precisely the same educational services
  • school district's tax invalid where, without reasonable justification, taxpayers residing in different counties were charged different amounts for precisely the same educational services

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Agnew, Read, Sharswood, Thompson, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.