Craft v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the reasonable-expectations doctrine is \a means of avoiding an unfair result where the insurer has engaged in some sort of deception \ (emphasis added)
• observing that “Friedland’s prejudice rationale hinged on the nature of prompt notice requirements”
• observing that “Friedland’s prejudice rationale hinged on the nature of prompt notice requirements”
• confirming that Friedland established a notice-prejudice rule for liability insurance cases
• \The conceptual differences between occurrence and claims-made liability policies lie at the core of this case .\ ( emphasis added )

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).