Craft v. Hodel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• assuming dubitante that plaintiffs' shirt-free appearances at Cape Cod National Seashore constituted \expressive conduct protected to some extent by the First Amendment\ (quotation omitted)
• finding a sufficient state interest in \protect[ing] the public from invasions of its sensibilities\
• ban on female toplessness at Cape Cod National Seashore did not violate equal protection clause because ordinance was “substantially related to the achievement of the government’s important governmental objective of protecting the public from invasions of its sensibilities”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).