Skip to main content
· 10/31/1995

Craft v. Chopra

Citations

  • 907 P.2d 1109
  • 1995 OK CIV APP 135
  • 66 O.B.A.J. 3850
  • 1995 Okla. Civ. App. LEXIS 116
  • 1995 WL 722245

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the reach of Oklahoma's discovery process does not extend beyond the state boundaries
  • concluding that the reach of Oklahoma's discovery process does not extend beyond the SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 194Th e 7 state boundaries
  • concluding that the reach of Oklahoma's discovery process does not extend beyond the SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 194Th e 7 state boundaries
  • rejecting the assertion that \discovery of documents from non-resident non-parties by subpoena issued in the State of Oklahoma\ is permitted \so long as the non-resident has sufficient due process 'minimum contacts' with the State of Oklahoma\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Joplin, Jones, Garrett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.