Crabtree v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he fact that a victim is able to break away from the confinement does not negate the determining factor that a jury could find, beyond a reasonable doubt, that a nonconsensual confinement took place.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Turner v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1987-06-04· cited 21×
• Lamotte v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1986-07-31· cited 20×
• Spangler v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1986-10-24· cited 11×
• Rhoton v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1985-10-02· cited 7×
• Arnold v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1987-07-13· cited 1×
• Ricketts v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1986-03-31
• Shawn Laver Perry v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2025-04-08

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Harris v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1981-09-04· cited 81×
• Johnson v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1979-06-20· cited 70×
• Fielden v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1982-07-29· cited 56×
• Reynolds v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1984-03-14· cited 47×
• Whitacre v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1980-12-04· cited 46×
• McNary v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1984-03-06· cited 32×
• Wilson v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1983-11-21· cited 31×
• Tunstall v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1983-08-10· cited 30×
• Spivey v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1982-06-08· cited 21×