Crabtree v. Reed
Citations
- 50 Ill. 206
Syllabus
<p>Evidence—of the degree of preponderance required. In an action on the case, herein i* is sought to recover damages for the killing of a mule belonging to tiie plaintiff, it is not necessary that there shall be a “ clear preponderance” of evidence in favor of the plaintiff to entitle him to recover. It is sufficient if the evidence creates probabilities in his favor—that the weight of the evidence inclines to his side.</p>
Judges: Breese
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Peak v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1875-01-15· cited 20×
- Hurzon v. SchmitzAppellate Court of Illinois· 1931-06-04· cited 14×
- Lenning v. LenningIllinois Supreme Court· 1898-10-24· cited 11×
- Woods v. DaileyIllinois Supreme Court· 1904-10-24· cited 8×
- Bitter v. SaathoffIllinois Supreme Court· 1881-03-21· cited 7×
- Cartier v. Troy Lumber Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1890-03-10· cited 4×
- North Chicago Street Railroad v. LouisAppellate Court of Illinois· 1890-03-10· cited 4×
- Solomon v. BuecheleAppellate Court of Illinois· 1905-04-10· cited 4×
- Thompson Lumber Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCommerce Court· 1912-02-13· cited 4×
- Nelson v. FehdAppellate Court of Illinois· 1902-11-11· cited 3×
- Wilson Grocery Co. v. National Surety Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1920-06-29· cited 3×
- Cleveland, C. C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. TrimmellAppellate Court of Illinois· 1898-06-03· cited 2×
- West Chicago Street Railway Co. v. MorasAppellate Court of Illinois· 1903-12-21· cited 1×
- Fowler v. CadeAppellate Court of Illinois· 1918-10-22· cited 1×
- Lenning v. LenningAppellate Court of Illinois· 1898-01-17
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.