· 3/13/1961
Crabtree v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co.
Citations
- 127 So. 2d 782
- 14 Oil & Gas Rep. 944
- 1961 La. App. LEXIS 1841
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that Delaware courts will enforce a non-reliance clause in “an agreement of sale or merger”
- applying New York law but noting the result would be the same under Delaware law
- explaining the “extra-contractual” vs. contractual fraud distinction and observing that the former may be disclaimed but the latter may not
- explaining the “extra-contractual” vs. contractual fraud distinction and observing that the former may be disclaimed but the latter may not
- affirming dismissal of extra- contractual fraud claims because the sophisticated bidder had agreed that “[o]nly those representations or warranties that are made to a purchaser in the Sale Agreement . . . have any legal effect”
- referring to Delaware limited liability company as a “limited liability corporation”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hall, Regan, Yarrut
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.