Skip to main content
· 3/13/1961

Crabtree v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co.

Citations

  • 127 So. 2d 782
  • 14 Oil & Gas Rep. 944
  • 1961 La. App. LEXIS 1841

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that Delaware courts will enforce a non-reliance clause in “an agreement of sale or merger”
  • applying New York law but noting the result would be the same under Delaware law
  • explaining the “extra-contractual” vs. contractual fraud distinction and observing that the former may be disclaimed but the latter may not
  • explaining the “extra-contractual” vs. contractual fraud distinction and observing that the former may be disclaimed but the latter may not
  • affirming dismissal of extra- contractual fraud claims because the sophisticated bidder had agreed that “[o]nly those representations or warranties that are made to a purchaser in the Sale Agreement . . . have any legal effect”
  • referring to Delaware limited liability company as a “limited liability corporation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hall, Regan, Yarrut

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.