Crabtree ex rel. Crabtree v. Muchmore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the board's discretion was limited only by a general \reasonableness\ requirement, not a substantive standard
• noting that the board’s discretion was limited only by a general ‘‘reasonableness’’ requirement, not a substantive standard
• noting that the board’s discretion was limited only by a general “reasonableness” requirement, not a substantive standard
• noting that the board’s discretion was limited only by a general ‘‘reasonableness’’ requirement, not a substantive standard
• noting that the right to a hearing in and of itself, even with the guidance of the Golden factors, does not create an interest protected by the Fourteenth Amendment
• holding the requirement that a city’s zoning decisions be reasonable and based upon legally determined factors was insufficient to confer upon an applicant for a zoning change a legitimate entitlement to a zoning change

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).