C.P. Ex Rel. M.L. v. Allstate Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Alaska applies the doctrine of reasonable expectations when interpreting insurance policies
• noting that “it is not clear how the joint obligations clause even bears on the exclusionary language critical here”
• claim that insured negligently failed to prevent claimant from being harmed by intentional act satisfied the “accident” requirement because “it is not unreasonable. .. (to) focus on the act attributed to (the insured seeking coverage
• “From the perspective of insureds whose acts are alleged to have negligently, but not criminally or intentionally, been a cause of a claimant’s injury, these exclusions do not apply to the negligence claims against them”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).