Cozzins v. Whitaker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that control premiums are paid for many reasons including: (1) synergy between firms; (2) belief that an acquirer can do better; (3) elimination of competition; and (4) market share
• stating that “the Court finds that the control premium used by Dr. Fin-nerty justified”
• awarding $26.5 million in damages per page in a fourteen-page opinion, for a total of $371,733 million
• where the FDIC allegedly repudiated a 1982 memorandum of understanding by increasing the plaintiffs capital requirements in 1991
• awarding $276 million in expectancy damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).