Coyote Publishing, Inc. v. Miller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \every court that has considered the argument that the regulations and instruction books promulgated by the IRS are within the scope of the PRA has rejected it. See United States v. Kerwin
• \Unlike the tip alleged in White --that White was carrying narcotics--or in [ Adams v. Williams
• post-indictment period exceeding one year \`marks the point at which courts deem the delay unreasonable enough to trigger the Barker [ v. Wingo
• reasoning in context of the right to effective assistance of counsel that \a trial is unfair if the accused is denied counsel at a critical stage of [] trial” and citing Brooks
• \Certain industries have such a history of government oversight that no reasonable expectation of privacy ... could exist for a proprietor over the stock of such an enterprise.” (citing United States v. Biswell
• statute of limitations \does not fully define ... rights with respect to the events occurring prior to indictment” (quoting Marion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).