· 3/3/1890

Coyne v. Union Pacific Railway Co.

Citations

  • 133 U.S. 370
  • 10 S. Ct. 382
  • 33 L. Ed. 651
  • 1890 U.S. LEXIS 1918

Syllabus

<p>In this case, which was an action against a railroad company, by one of its employés, to recover damages for a personal injury, it was Held, that it was proper for the Circuit Court to direct the jury to find a verdict for the defendant.</p> <p>The plaintiff was a laborer or construction hand, under a construction boss • or foreman of the defendant. He was injured by the fall of a steel rail, which he and other laborers were trying to load from the ground upon a flat car, and which struck the side of the car and fell back. The negligence alleged was, that the foreman moved out the construction train to which the flat car belonged, in the face of an approaching regular freight train, to avoid which the laborers were hurrying to load the rails; and ‘that he failed to give the customary word of command .to lift the rail in concert, but, with the approaching freight train in sight, and with oaths and imprecations, ordered the men to get the rail on in any way they could, and they lifted it without concert; Held, that whatever negligence there was, was that of either the plaintiff himself or of his fellow servants who with him had hold of the rail.</p>

Judges: Blatchford, Brewer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.