Coyne v. SCHWARTZ, GOLD, COHEN, ZAKARIN

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining, in a legal malpractice action, that the defending law firm's assertion that a subsequent firm had been negligent did not serve to override the client's attorney-client privilege with the subsequent firm
• “Orders compelling production of matters claimed to be protected by the attorney-client privilege or work product doctrine present the required potential for irreparable harm.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).