Skip to main content
· 6/20/1991

Coyne v. Robert H. Anderson & Associates, Inc.

Citations

  • 574 N.E.2d 863
  • 215 Ill. App. 3d 104
  • 158 Ill. Dec. 750
  • 1991 Ill. App. LEXIS 1063

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Expert testimony is improper when the inquiry regards an area within the common knowledge of the average juror”
  • \Expert testimony is improper when the inquiry regards an area within the common knowledge of the average juror\
  • \Expert testimony is improper when the inquiry regards an area within the common knowledge of the average juror\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McLAREN

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.