Coyne Industrial Laundry of Schenectady, Inc. v. Gould

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]f the defendant saw the decree as ambiguous ... he could have sought clarification from the court before he engaged in the questionable conduct”
• violation of a decree prohibiting the defendant from soliciting a laundry business in “Massachusetts, Rhode Island and several Connecticut counties”
• dispute over meaning of terms in restraining order insufficient to render order ambiguous
• defendant properly held in contempt where restraining order term not ambiguous but \if the defendant saw the decree as ambiguous . . . he could have sought clarification from the court before he engaged in the questionable conduct\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).