Coykendall v. Lima Refining Co.
Citations
- 248 N.E.3d 928
- 2024 Ohio 2835
Syllabus
No error in giving jury instruction on duty where it was a correct statement of law and was warranted by the facts of the case that presented a disagreement over the scope of the duty owed in an oral agreement. No error in denying motion for JNOV on issue of causation in a toxic substances case where expert witnesses were permitted to testify to general and specific causation. No error in apportioning damages for comparative fault before applying statutory cap on noneconomic damages.
Judges: Sulek
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.