Coy Allen and Esther Allen v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that claim assertion personal injury for loss of consortium did not exhaust “a claim for recovery of property damage which occurred in connection with the accident”
• holding that claim assertion personal injury for loss of consortium did not exhaust “a claim for recovery of property damage which occurred in connection with the accident”
• holding that claim assertion personal injury for loss of consortium did not exhaust “a claim for recovery of property damage which occurred in connection with the accident”
• holding that claim assertion personal injury for loss of consortium did not exhaust “a claim for recovery of property damage which occurred in connection with the accident”
• holding that claim assertion personal injury for loss of consortium did not exhaust “a claim for recovery of property damage which occurred in connection with the accident”
• holding that a plaintiff could not bring a personal injury tort claim in district court when he filed an administrative tort claim that placed a value on property damages but left the “personal injury” section of his claim blank

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).