Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 11/23/1987
Coxe v. Coxe
Citations
- 363 S.E.2d 906
- 294 S.C. 291
- 1987 S.C. App. LEXIS 437
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- family court judges are given broad jurisdiction in the equitable distribution of marital property and the trial judge may use any reasonable means to divide the estate equitably
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Peirson v. CalhounCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1992-03-30· cited 20×
- Belton v. BeltonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-01-13· cited 10×
- Wooten v. WootenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-06-05· cited 9×
- Sharpe v. SharpeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1992-04-13· cited 5×
- Wooten v. WootenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-03-10· cited 4×
- Coxe v. CoxeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-03-27
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lide v. LideSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-10-26· cited 67×
- Allen v. AllenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-01-22· cited 30×
- Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-03-13· cited 19×
- Stearns v. StearnsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-03-05· cited 12×
- Bass v. BassCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-03-27· cited 11×
- Bailey v. BaileySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1977-06-06· cited 10×
- Prince v. PrinceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-04-08· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.