Skip to main content
· 8/4/2008

CoxCom, Inc. v. Chaffee

Citations

  • 536 F.3d 101
  • 87 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1667
  • 45 Communications Reg. (P&F) 870
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 16485
  • 2008 WL 2954968

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that appellants’ “active participation both leading up to and during the bench trial,” coupled with a failure to “specifically object to the lack of a jury,” constituted waiver
  • determining that a cable company’s pay-per-view system, which scrambled pay-per-view programming unless a subscriber purchased the content, constituted an access control
  • finding waiver where pro se party actively participated in bench trial without objecting until after trial
  • noting plaintiffs need only show that they were “directly affected by the conduct complained of, and therefore have a personal stake in the suit” (citation and quotation marks omitted)
  • “The district court’s earlier findings in support of the ... preliminary injunction, combined with [the plaintiffs] success on the merits, supports the permanent injunction.”
  • “[T]he public has an interest in the enforcement of federal statutes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Lipez, Howard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.