· 8/4/2008
CoxCom, Inc. v. Chaffee
Citations
- 536 F.3d 101
- 87 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1667
- 45 Communications Reg. (P&F) 870
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 16485
- 2008 WL 2954968
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that appellants’ “active participation both leading up to and during the bench trial,” coupled with a failure to “specifically object to the lack of a jury,” constituted waiver
- determining that a cable company’s pay-per-view system, which scrambled pay-per-view programming unless a subscriber purchased the content, constituted an access control
- finding waiver where pro se party actively participated in bench trial without objecting until after trial
- noting plaintiffs need only show that they were “directly affected by the conduct complained of, and therefore have a personal stake in the suit” (citation and quotation marks omitted)
- “The district court’s earlier findings in support of the ... preliminary injunction, combined with [the plaintiffs] success on the merits, supports the permanent injunction.”
- “[T]he public has an interest in the enforcement of federal statutes.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Torruella, Lipez, Howard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.