Skip to main content
· 12/26/1996

Cox v. Worker's Compensation Board of Indiana

Citations

  • 675 N.E.2d 1053
  • 1996 WL 734903
  • 1996 Ind. LEXIS 188

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that order granting TTD benefits was an award subject to appellate review, even though the parties’ dispute was not yet fully resolved as to all issues
  • “This concept, also designated ‘quiescence’ in the jargon of worker’s compensation, essentially means that the worker has achieved the fullest reasonably expected recovery.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boehm, Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Selby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.