· 12/26/1996
Cox v. Worker's Compensation Board of Indiana
Citations
- 675 N.E.2d 1053
- 1996 WL 734903
- 1996 Ind. LEXIS 188
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that order granting TTD benefits was an award subject to appellate review, even though the parties’ dispute was not yet fully resolved as to all issues
- “This concept, also designated ‘quiescence’ in the jargon of worker’s compensation, essentially means that the worker has achieved the fullest reasonably expected recovery.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boehm, Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Selby
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.