Cox v. United States Department of Agriculture

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when a district court lacks jurisdiction under the derivative jurisdiction doctrine, the court is “bound to dismiss the [complaint] rather than remand to state court”
• holding district court “was bound to dismiss” case for lack of 13 jurisdiction “under the derivative jurisdiction doctrine,” “rather than remand [it] to state 14 court,” where the state court lacked jurisdiction
• determining the district court lacked jurisdiction over an action against a federal agency that the agency removed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1442 under the doctrine of derivative jurisdiction
• applying derivative jurisdiction doctrine to removal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1442(a)(1)
• dismissal—not remand—was appropriate remedy where, under doctrine of derivative jurisdiction, district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over removed case
• dismissal required due to lack of derivative jurisdiction over claim removed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1442

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).